Sputnik 1 (/ˈspʌtnɪk, ˈspʊtnɪk/, ‹See Tfd›Russian: Спутник-1, Satellite 1) was the first artificial Earth satellite. It was launched into an elliptical low Earth orbit by the Soviet Union on 4 October 1957 as part of the Soviet space program. It sent a radio signal back to Earth for three weeks before its three silver-zinc batteries became depleted. Aerodynamic drag caused it to fall back into the atmosphere on 4 January 1958. The world’s first observation was made at the school observatory in Rodewisch (Saxony).

It was a polished metal sphere 58 cm (23 in) in diameter with four external radio antennas to broadcast radio pulses. Its radio signal was easily detectable by amateur radio operators, and the 65° orbital inclination made its flight path cover virtually the entire inhabited Earth.

The satellite’s success was unanticipated by the United States. This precipitated the American Sputnik crisis and triggered the Space Race, part of the Cold War. The launch was the beginning of a new era of political, military, technological, and scientific developments. The word sputnik is Russian for satellite when interpreted in an astronomical context; its other meanings are spouse or traveling companion.

Tracking and studying Sputnik 1 from Earth provided scientists with valuable information. The density of the upper atmosphere could be deduced from its drag on the orbit, and the propagation of its radio signals gave data about the ionosphere.

Sputnik 1 was launched during the International Geophysical Year from Site No.1/5, at the 5th Tyuratam range, in Kazakh SSR (now known as the Baikonur Cosmodrome). The satellite traveled at a peak speed of about 8 km/s (18,000 mph), taking 96.20 minutes to complete each orbit. It transmitted on 20.005 and 40.002 MHz, which were monitored by radio operators throughout the world. The signals continued for 22 days until the transmitter batteries depleted on 26 October 1957. On 4 January 1958, after three months in orbit, Sputnik 1 burned up while reentering Earth’s atmosphere, having completed 1,440 orbits of the Earth, and travelling a distance of approximately 70,000,000 km (43,000,000 mi).

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

      • PaX [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s okay meow-hug

        You got any cool math things or projects (doesn’t have to be math-related ofc) you’re working on? I saw and loved your bit-algorithm posting the other day lol

        Personally my preferred approach to any computational problem like list sorting or RSA cracking is to put a computer in close orbit around the sun until the cosmic rays reprogram it to use the ideal algorithm for the problem and solve it for me

        • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Kind of, but not super interesting at the moment. I have a long term goal of transitioning my career to something more signal processing related, and I have an engineering friend who thinks my background would be decently suited for imaging tasks in manufacturing. I started going through a signals and systems class from OCW last couple of days, the material is nothing new so far, but getting the engineering jargon is good so I won’t sound like an idiot.

          The course is also from a course-on-tape series that MIT was running in the 80s, so it’s like extremely fun. You see random retro tech when they’re showing you waveforms, the professor has an 80s moustache, the lectures have like an opening credits sequence that’s very 80s. It’s the first couple of mins here: https://youtu.be/KJnAy6hzetw

          • PaX [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            Oooh this looks interesting, I will watch it, very 80s-vibes indeed lol

            If we are exchanging cool, old signals-related educational media, you may like this cool AT&T-produced video demonstrating wave behavior: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DovunOxlY1k

            It’s basic stuff but is really fun to see it demonstrated so immediately and physically

            What kind of manufacturing imaging stuff do you mean exactly if you don’t mind saying?

              • PaX [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                That’s so real, especially if they start using corpo or corpo-adjacent terms lol

                I watched that lecture, was interesting but kept zoning out, thinking about the lost art of continuous-time signal processing and analog computers lol. Could see myself falling asleep to that tbh

                Was really interesting to see that primitive, presumably edge-detecting algorithm they ran on the cloud picture. Effective at revealing road network but very ugly lol

                I’m just yapping now but my friend has this issue where they often want to sample pieces of music to use for their own music but it’s difficult extracting single components or instruments from everything else in a song. Their approach is to use these awful, usually ad-infested or subscription-pushing web AI tools to get the samples out of the music but I guess the key to get the perfect sample on your own is to try to extract what you need out of the song in the frequency-domain, which I never considered before, will have to find software that can help and see if we can do it together

                • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  If the music is in stereo, I think there may be ML libraries that could handle it reasonably well? But out of the box stuff will probably try to isolate human voices from the rest of the noise. Iirc you only need two spatially seperated mics to get very accurate filtering for background noise, hence why everyone looks insane in teams meetings now by apologizing for stuff only they can hear.

                  • PaX [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    I think everything is in stereo, which I guess implies spatially separated microphones doesn’t it…

                    I have no idea how this works though, either way this is like the most nerd way to look at sampling songs lol

                    ML/“”“AI”“” has been such a boon for signal processing hasn’t it lol

                    Apologies my brain is melting further tonight