• mox@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    Reminds me of a recent Disney case:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c8jl0ekjr0go

    It bothers me that we as a society continue to surrender our agency, our rights, and even our well-being to whatever restrictions a corporation makes up to benefit itself, just because they’re in a (practically unavoidable) terms & conditions document.

    It’s getting so bad that people sometimes mistake corporate policies for law, crying “that’s illegal” if someone steps outside the bounds of a software license.

    Adding insult to injury, enforcement of these things is paid for by us, through taxes.

    • The Pantser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      This would be the exact same type deal if it was an Uber driver that ran into a pedestrian that happened to have a Uber account and they said the victim can’t sue because they were an Uber user at one time. I think it’s time we all stop singing up for any service that has that clause. I know I plan to read the T&C for everything now.