For those not aware, Google is rolling out their new AI-based “Generative AI” search, which seems to mesh Bard with the standard experience.

I asked it today why Google no longer follows their “don’t be evil” motto… The results are pretty hilarious.

    • democracy1984@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Corporations are neither evil nor nice. They are indifferent. By design they only care about money, they don’t care about anything else.

      • Alperto
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not really. They’re not indifferent at all. In reality they act like narcissistic and like psychopathic humans. I watched a documentary years ago exploring that and talking with psychologists about symptoms and they agreed that they behave like psychopaths. And don’t forget that they are run by humans.

        Corporations:

        • Can buy and sell stuff
        • Can do evil things without consequences (an employee can pay the consequences but the company will keep going).
        • They have no remorse or empathy.
        • Can manipulate to reach their goals, no matter who (from media to politics to countries).
        • Whenever somebody at the top can’t reach an economical goal, that person is fired and replaced by one who can. It’s like a hive evil mind.
        • Goal #1 is always money (absolute selfish and egomaniac), no matter what or who.
        • CybranM@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Didn’t you just list a bunch of reasons for why they’re indifferent? They literally only care about money and are indifferent to externalised costs and ethics.

          • my_hat_stinks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            1 year ago

            If a person cared only about money and regularly injured or killed people to get it, would you say they are good, evil, or just “indifferent”?

          • Alperto
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            They would be indifferent if they were also indifferent about money, but they’re absolutely driven by greed, so no, they’re not indifferent: if they see a chance to make more money, they’ll go for it no matter what or who they harm with it.

      • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        By design they only care about money, they don’t care about anything else.

        That is cartoon book clear definition of evil. No empathy, clear goal, willing to do anything to reach that goal - yep that is evil.

      • yata@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        They are indifferent

        They only care about money

        They can’t be both, and since the latter claim is the correct one, then it also supports the claim that they are evil. Because since we know that their sole and primary concern is money, then we also know to which extent they will go to get that money.

      • Nichaes@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not being outright malicious but ending up doing malicious things makes this distinction pretty pointless.

      • outdated_belated@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Correct in the sense that it’s the incentive scheme, i.e., capitalism (supported by state power, e.g., by enshrining the entity of a corporation and then enforcing its protection) that is the more meaningful, or at least actionable, cause of these behaviors.

        While those incentive schemes are in place, ascribing too much agency to corporations themselves, i.e., calling them evil, is not particularly effective as it’s not going to change the underlying incentives.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most evil is caused by indifference though.

        Someone who hates people can be talked to and potentially can change.

        Someone who’s indifferent will use hatred as a tool to control people. When this tactic is successful, and indifferent person can’t be swayed from using it, because it works.

        I mean if it were proven that google’s algorithms are encouraging violence, what would an indifferent person do? They’d ask, “is the algorithm making money?” And if the answer is yes, they would make no change to the algorithm. Because they are indifferent to the evil that they are causing.

      • kaba0@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They are the stereotypical paper clip AI that will drain our blood to extract its iron content for more paperclips. Except it wants money.

    • tookmyname
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ok but which one is the least evil? I’m gonna throw out Costco.

    • mechoman444@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Reason number 2: they have to continuously show increasing profit year after year.

      Making $9 billion one year and 9 billion in next year is not good business apparently (9 billion was a number I pulled out of nowhere random number)

    • z2k_@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup, the board can be sued for not being evil if not being evil ends up tanking the stock price.