I hate this fucking shit so much. “But think of the potential!”
The purpose of a system is what it does. Full stop.
Bit idea: Use AI to generate your slop and get that published so AI uses AI generated slop to learn and continuously gets worse
a human centipede ouroboros, a machine shitting into its own mouth forever
Yes that’s already being done and while it will kill LLMs, it’s not very good for people who read or do science.
while it will kill LLMs
Yeah yeah they can be useful tools for specific tasks, but the hype and outright techbro occult euphoria needs to fucking die already.
It won’t kill llms, but it’ll make curating the training data the most expensive and laborious part. No more freebies like feeding the entire internet into it
The field really needs to die and be reborn. The journal model is a relic of a time when only 200 million people could read and write.
Publication output has gone from 1 million in 2000 to 2 million in ~2010, with 3.3 million publications produced in 2022.
If LLMs heighten the contradictions of the political economy of science and push it towards a new model, I won’t be upset about it.
If LLMs heighten the contradictions of the political economy of science and push it towards a new model, I won’t be upset about it.
In the current system, that only happens if can get immediately richer or if he can be convinced that it’ll make him richer soon. The contradictions, like in so many other things, are otherwise maintained even at the expense of future profitability.
In this paper AI will show . . .
I hope this answer was helpful!
Incredible bit of scientific writing that would produce, and start to self-reinforce.
If Nintendo is allowed to sit on and do nothing with some of their 30 year old IPs, then why the FUCK should anyone share anything with them?
Thanks porky for showing that crime is a social construct. Literally getting mad at not being able to do piracy, but if you use your one-time purchase of adobe premiere for too long? Freeze dirtbag! That’s stealing!
I think this is posted in the wrong comm, the only way you could argue this isn’t the correct reaction to a piece of terrible (but completely predictable) news is if you somehow pretend he’s not being sarcastic.
I agree with the top person in that link; the dredge part is what’s being responded to there.
That’s why I quoted the dredgeworthy part in the title.
That’s not even a bad take though it’s transparently an agreement to participate in a corporate scam.