• ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Your reply came out as, one that was trying to refute the claim of some anti-Rust comment. Which the previous comment was not.

    The way Rust works, clearly shows that it was developed by people who cared about those things.

    And just because something happened in my bubble, doesn’t directly prove it to not be happening anywhere else, just because it doesn’t prove otherwise.

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Then why do you bring that up, after the argumentation that people did not want to learn? Look I try to be constructive. There are people who do not want to learn, but saying that all security issues is to attribute to that is wrong. Lot of the best engineers and programmers do their best, long time experts and groups, who still make mistakes.

      What i"m saying is, that your example is not applicable in this discussion, because you are not writing systems programming for operating systems (such as Android or Windows or Linux), which are used by millions of people and ton of hackers try to find vulnerabilities. The best programmers in C and C++ make these mistakes that Rust would prevent (or make it much easier to find and eliminate).

      That’s the point. It’s not about these experts not wanting to learn or not caring. We are not talking about the typical programmer for a website for company x or a fake game programmer for Android.