• bloodfart
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I don’t buy that.

    I know personally that election worker pay is dogshit. It’s way too cheap to do an election. Even if it weren’t, even if a person didn’t have my mistrust of machine voting, wouldn’t recognizing that the vote will likely be contested mean that going ahead and preparing to do a hand count anyway be the right choice?

    I mean, we’re headed for hand counts in the future anyway because no one trusts the elections. Even if someone wasn’t a proponent of hand counts like me, isn’t it good to be ready?

    What chaos that you talked about is gonna be brought on by this hand count? I can’t help but think that the whole election is chaotic…

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 minutes ago

      Pretty simple:

      • They require three people on each count. One is a Republican, one a Democrat, one an election worker
      • There isn’t money to hire election workers, so they can’t count the ballots fast
      • The Republicans are going to raise all sorts of random objections with no real basis
      • The slow counting in urban areas plus the spurious objections creates an excuse for local boards to refuse to certify the results
      • This in turn means no EVs from Georgia, so the election gets tossed to the house