Work by Ron Cobb

    • Cris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Do honda s2000s get that bad of gas milage? They’re pretty small, lightweight cars

      • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        18 hours ago

        The engine is pretty high strung so you’re lucky to get 20-24 mpg. If you drive it hard (and it wants to be driven hard) it’s going to be less. That’s still probably better than the kind of huge muscle car in the picture, though.

        The other thing is it’s just not a pleasant car to drive in traffic. It’s a manual transmission car (only ever made in manual) and it’s really easy to stall, among other things, so it’s not fun to drive through rush hour.

        • ...m...@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          …i’m surprised to read that; my elise and MX-5s all get around thirty miles per gallon on the street, it’s only on tracks where fuel economy drops precipitously…

          • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            The S2k is just in a weird spot due to the engine being so crazy. The 2005 EPA rating was 17/23 for example. It’s a combination of high revving engine (you seriously drive in the 3-5k rev range in normal traffic), short gear ratios, and more weight than either an MX-5 or Elise. The thing is a legend but it’s far from perfect! Or perhaps, it’s a legend because of the imperfections the engineers gave it.

            • ...m...@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              …the elise’s 2ZZ-GE is nearly as highly-strung as the F20 (splits the difference from the F20C at 8500 RPM) but it’s also 10% less displacement, which may make the most difference in fuel economy compared to pushing 40% more weight in the S2000…

              …i wish my mazdas revved so high!..

        • Cris@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          Ahh, gotcha. Thats a shame, my dream car is a miata which I’ve always wanted to daily drive, and I tend to think of the s2000 similarly since they’re a lot alike in many respects

          • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Miatas are pretty similar, but modern ones have some nice advantages! It’s rated for 25/35 mpg, for example, and unlike a lot of car makers Mazda’s fuel economy numbers are pretty realistic. A Miata isn’t going to be as painful to drive in traffic, either. Not unless you modify it or something.

            • Cris@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              14 hours ago

              My dream car is an NA, so a bit less practical lol, but I still desperately want one

            • vrj@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Also the clutch doesn’t require much force to engage, and 1st gear seems pretty forgiving, at least on the NDs. I can’t say I enjoy driving in traffic, but it’s not too bad