• Belly_Beanis [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh ya the sultans were kind of a bunch of dipshits “lol let’s use slaves to fight our wars and give them a bunch of guns and access to plunder what could possibly go wrong surely they would never resent me, the sultan, since I’m literally the best (everybody is saying it)”

          • machiabelly [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I mean it worked really well until the ottoman empire stopped expanding. They operated by taking orphans from recently conquered areas and conscripting them. Once the new piece of land became more incorporated and there weren’t enough orphans anymore they’d have to move on to the next place. Once expansion stopped for a long enough period of time they had to reform the Janissaries into a hereditary organization which both eroded their effectiveness in battle, and gave them political power.

            Basically every single Ottoman institution was based around the assumption of conquest. And, to be fair, they continually expanded their borders for 400 years. Their decline took another 200 years after that. Liberal capitalism is only 200 years old and its already starting to decline so the ottomans were pretty baller by comparison.

          • Llituro [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            i think mamluks and the separation of military and interior concerns within various Islamic states of the period are very interesting developments tbh. it was a very interesting aspect of reading Debt. part of the core notion there was hacking around the no muslims killing muslims rule in Islam. what do you do when the other caliphate has shit you want? simply send our christian slave army to fight them of course! but then, this also is the kind of thing that allowed the interesting proto-capitalist economy based on mutual cooperation to come into existing, and the islamic world to innovate checks that could be written in Mali and cashed in Iran. especially this is interesting when you compare it to the 10’s of thousands of tiny feudal territories that Europe was carved into at the same time.

            • Belly_Beanis [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 months ago

              what do you do when the other caliphate has shit you want? simply send our christian slave army to fight them of course!

              God: Oh shit o fuck they outsmarted me! I’VE BEEN FOILED AGAIN! Hopefully they don’t find out about the poophole loophole…

        • mathemachristian [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          The sultanate existed until 1920, there are a lot of fascists reminiscing about the days when Turkey was an empire. The “rule britannica” analogue I guess. Or Reichsbürger in germany. Seriously every country in europe has them I think.

          Turkey was an empire a bit over a hundred years ago and whatever brainworms you can find in Britain, Spain, France, Germany, Italy etc. you can also find there. Turkey is an oppressor nation.

          • Llituro [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            it’s funny because all of their current geopolitical relevance is tied up in their former position relative to the ussr and its current position relative to russia, and that is so broken that it’s been in the hands of one plutocrat for the last 25 years. these dumbass ottoman revisionists don’t understand that they already have the corrupt theocratic monarchy they’re dreaming about, they’re just obsessed with the aesthetic characteristics and upset about vote and that people don’t like lebased grey wolf genocidaires anymore. even though they do.

            • mathemachristian [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              They don’t have the theocratic monarchy they’re dreaming about because they don’t own land that belongs to another nation. The while point of empire. Or at least they don’t think they do, since they dont think about kurdistans occupied territory as another nations.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      So many “LARP it 'til they make it” chuds think they’d be on the throne, or the vizier whispering to the side of the throne. Main Character Syndrome is a helluva drug.

        • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sure, there’s plenty of “being trampled by the overlord is cool as long as the others get trampled harder” bootlickers out there, but there’s also the “I would sit on the throne of skulls, not be one of the skulls in the throne of skulls” edgelord nerds too.