• Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    They don’t work because concert tickets are still under valued. If an artist can sell out a 9,000 person venue at $20 a seat, and then they find out they can still sell out the same venue charging $200 a seat - just to a different crowd, then they are going to go with the $200 option.

    I love going to concerts and now that I’m older I mostly avoid General Admission tickets, so I’m already paying more. This year I’ve gone to 6 concerts and on average I’ve paid around $120 per ticket. While expensive, I’ve never felt like what I paid wasn’t worth it. But, when it comes to beer/water/food I always feel that it’s over priced and not worth the cost. Don’t get me started on the employee asking for a 20% tip on a $20 beer.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Watch the video. Neither the artist nor the venue have any real say on the matter.

      • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Artists absolutely do have a say on the matter, they can say no. They can not tour. They can only do small venues that don’t use Live Nation. They can use other ticketing services - although the most expensive concert I went to this year was Rolling Stones and they didn’t use Ticketmaster.

        Artists choose to go with Live Nation because it makes them money, provides a better ticketing experience for their fans, and gives the artist a boogeyman to blame for high ticket costs. Pearl Jam tried to fight this fight in the 90s and realized that there isn’t a better alternative if they wanted to tour and make money. They chose to keep touring and went back to using Ticketmaster.