redimk@lemmy.fmhy.ml to Antiwork/Work Reform@lemmy.fmhy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoDon't know if this content belongs here, but I just think this is awful in so many levels.www.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up1109arrow-down16 cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fansfrance@lemmy.worldtech@kbin.socialnews@kbin.socialtechnologynews@lemmy.worldworkreform@lemmy.worldhackernews@derp.foonews_tech@lemmy.link
arrow-up1103arrow-down1external-linkDon't know if this content belongs here, but I just think this is awful in so many levels.www.theverge.comredimk@lemmy.fmhy.ml to Antiwork/Work Reform@lemmy.fmhy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square45fedilink cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fansfrance@lemmy.worldtech@kbin.socialnews@kbin.socialtechnologynews@lemmy.worldworkreform@lemmy.worldhackernews@derp.foonews_tech@lemmy.link
minus-squarearquebus_x@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoCopyright doesn’t cover elements that are not the product of human labor, which means it does not cover physical bodies or faces or voices or anything like that. What you’re describing falls under the classification of personality rights.
Copyright doesn’t cover elements that are not the product of human labor, which means it does not cover physical bodies or faces or voices or anything like that.
What you’re describing falls under the classification of personality rights.