• Godort@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        3 months ago

        You could bake something at 420 Celsius too, assuming your okay with charcoal as the end product

      • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        ok you actually convinced me, Fahrenheit is better (except I can’t spell it properly without autocorrect)

        • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          I can’t spell it properly without autocorrect

          This is genuinely the most inconvenient thing about Fahrenheit

      • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        you can also bake things at 420C if you’re not a coward about this (like proper thin pizza) (maybe it’s a bit too high but you get the idea)

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        You can make the temperature dial of an oven have matching degrees of rotation and degrees Celcius.

        Turn the dial to point straight down to bake at 180°

        Turn it 3/4 of the way to cook a pizza at 270°

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        A cup of lukewarm coffee please.

        Edit: my wrong, I thought it was 69°F !

        All my excuses

        • expatriado@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          According to James Hoffmann, the ideal temperature to enjoy coffee is between 50°C and 60°C, he may know a thing or two about coffee, and you may think the coffee you drink is hotter that it really is.

    • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Also it’s a 0-100 scale of how hot it is outside, and it requires no prior understanding to use it as such.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        The freezing point of water is very important to weather, and requires prior knowledge of the arbitrary number 32.

        • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Is it? Only pure water will actually freeze at 0c. Rain, puddles, lakes, etc aren’t all that pure… And we’re talking about ambient air temps here. The air can be below freezing and it can still rain. And you can get snow/hail above freezing…

          Knowing the freezing point is just one factor. Knowing it’s generally around 30F is pretty much always close enough (not that remembering 32 is actually very difficult)

          Edit: also water only freezes at 0c if it’s at sea level… I really don’t think 0°=freezing is the huge advantage that celcius stans think it is.

        • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          Okay so fahrenheit has a well-defined high and low, but an arbitrary freezing point of one certain chemical. All other chemical freezing points are arbitrary.

          Celsius has an arbitrary high and low, but a well-defined freezing point of that same chemical. All other freezing points are arbitrary.

          If your motivation is to minimize the amount of arbitrary values you have to memorize, fahrenheit is the clear winner.

          • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            The zero C is freezing and 100 C is boiling, so not really arbitrary.

            But it’s pretty hard to define a scale that has intuitive, round numbers for everything we might care about.

            • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              You’re correct. In a lab setting, 0C and 100C are not arbitrary.

              In the weather forecast, they are.

              Which ties into your final point, it’s hard to define a scale that is best for everything, which is exactly what I’ve been saying this whole time. Fahrenheit is better for some things, Celsius for others.

              The only reason people in this thread are saying otherwise is because for some reason they’ve tied up some significant part of their self-worth into their belief that “lmao DAE fahrenheit bad amirite??1?”, and they mistakenly believe that those of us that understand nuance are trying to belittle or disparage them in some way. I assure you, we are not.

          • criticon@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            The 0 in Fahrenheit was based on nothing and the 100F was supposed to be human temperature but it is off by some degrees

            The water is not an arbitrary temperature, the weather is water dependant, at 0C the water will freeze and you get snow/ice instead of rain

            • actually@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              0°F is when the ocean freezes

              100° F was human body temperature, later revised somewhat with better measurements and a decrease of parasites . The average person in those days in London had a slightly higher body temperature than today

              • criticon@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                0F is not ocean freezing, is the freezing temp of a brine mix that he chose arbitrarily (some think that he chose that temp because it was close to the coldest his town had ever been and he used it to calibrate the scales of his thermometers)

                FYI, the ocean freezes at around 28F

                • actually@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Oceans freezing also depends on currents, and mixing of the water from the surface. 28° will freeze water in a room.

                  This is why often the ocean is not frozen at much lower temperatures.

                  I’m not at all cognizant of how 0 was decided

          • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            It’s not like the weather depends on the boiling point of formaldehyde…

      • Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        If that was true outsiders should be able to use Fahrenheit without much explanation. I’ve never got a clue what the °F values mean, I always have to use a converter. It’s really not as intuitive as people who grew up with it seem to believe.