• Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean fuck AT&T, but fuck needless consolidation, pointless service bundling, and revocation of perpetual licences even more.

    • Beacon@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      This isn’t a revocation of a perpetual license. This is about broadcom not offering their support services any more. ATT still has the perpetual license to use the software they bought

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      The wise thing is to not offer perpetual licenses in the first place. You can’t predict the state of your business in 10 years let alone beyond that. Why make commitments that? Marketing of course. So if they’re going to raise capital that way (by one-time revenue from sales of perpetual licenses) then they can’t just decide that perpetual doesn’t mean perpetual anymore. All in all this will come down to a legal duel between expensive legal teams.

      • Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        Perpetual licences have their place, like I’m reasonably confident under the hood you have a perpetual licences for the OS your phone runs on. The point isn’t to get a piece of software that will be updated and supported forever, it’s to get something that works, fits your needs, and that you know can’t just be revoked at the whim of another. Problem is that last one is becoming increasingly untrue.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m sure it’s different with enterprise contracts, but VMWare support was next to useless when I used to pay for it on 20 servers. Not once did a problem get solved, and some of them must have been pretty widespread bugs from what I recall.

    • tabularasa@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      This seems to be common among most software/hardware vendors these days. I can’t get good support from Microsoft, Citrix, Juniper, Cisco, etc.

      • femtech@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I got good support from redhat, had an individual dev help out with a difficult openshift deployment.

      • Juvyn00b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I never knew Microsoft even had support. Was part of a very large (worldwide) enterprise and remember the other teams complaining about lack of anything when trying to escalate issues.

    • Avatar_of_Self@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not different really. Either it is obvious and you don’t need them or its your hardware vendor’s fault (according to them). Still better than Oracle’s software support, which is not a high bar.

    • Pringles@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I have had to contact the vmware enterprise support several times and while it was tedious to do so, they always managed to help us out, including when we had datastore locked vhd’s after a storage crash.

    • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not really the same thing. “Lifetime warranties” have for decades now referred to the lifetime of the product as stated in the warranty, not the lifetime of the consumer.

      Any consumer still interpreting “Lifetime” in this context to mean “the rest of my life”, is just being stupid. Read the terms of the agreement before assuming you know what it protects…

      “Perpetual licensing” on the other hand, is pretty clearly defined as “pay once, use forever”, so to sunset that agreement and start charging subscription fees is fraudulent.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        There have been instances of things like “lifetime licenses” or free services that were “free forever” that turned around and started subscription services. I hope this clarifies my intent, I did not indicate a “warranty”.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      My university purchased a large number of Adobe Suite licenses years ago. Then we got a threatening letter that we never bought perpetual licenses and they were considering suing us.

      Know what’s a thing? Figma.

      • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        I didn’t know of Figma, but then again I don’t know much of that kind of work. How does it compare in terms of feature parity?

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Somewhere between in design and illustrator. It’s good for general design work. I think you can get it free for personal use if you want to check it out—it’s fully online.

  • ProxyZeus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    I like this case for the matter that I don’t think there is a way for them to really settle, so this could come out with a pretty good precedent for consumers and licenses