• db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    The problem is that you need to check those sources today make sure it’s not just making up bullshit and at that point you didn’t gain anything from the genai

    • wurstgulasch3000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      As I said the links provide some entry points for further research. It’s providing some use to me because I don’t need to check every search result. But to each their own and I understand the general scepticism of generative “AI”

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        If you don’t check everyone source. It might be just bullshitting you. There’s people who followed your approach and got into hot shit with their bosses and judges

        • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          There is absolutely value in something compiling sources for you to personally review. Anyone who cannot use AI efficiently is analogous to someone who can’t see the utility in a graphing calculator. It’s not magic, it’s a tool. And tools need to be used precisely, and for appropriate purposes.

          My plumber fucks up I don’t blame his wrench. My lawyers don’t vet their case work, I blame them.

      • ZeroHora
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The sources are the same result of the search? Or at least the top results?