The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration last week set a hearing date to take comment on the proposed historic change in federal drug policy for Dec. 2.

The hearing date means a final decision could well come in the next administration. While it’s possible it could precede the end of President Joe Biden’s term, issuing it before Inauguration Day “would be pretty expedited,” said cannabis lawyer Brian Vicente.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    It was already bullshit, the only need to “look into it” was to stall and hope someone found something that can be twisted into backing an existing opinion.

    The DEA didn’t do a single study, they “looked into” stuff we’ve known for over a decade hunting for that unicorn study that says cannabis is dangerous.

    Like with climate change. We started “looking into” that in 1982 with a political committee. But Biden set record setting fossil fuel production this term.

    Or when Dems and Republicans united to tell FDR we had to “look into” universal healthcare 80 years ago. And still say we need to “look into” it more.

    “Moderates” love to say they’re going to “look into” stuff, but in reality it’s just an excuse not to do anything and avoid the negative press.

    We can’t keep giving them credit before they do anything like our memories only last 2 years and we can’t see the pattern. I mean, surely there are some people who can’t figure it out, but an average adult should be able to pretty quickly.

    “Moderates” only exist to prevent progress. That’s their whole thing, they’ll never going to let meaningful progress happen at a pace that beats conservatives breaking everything. It’s just not a valid strategy, but that’s what wealthy donors want, so that’s what we get.

    • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Legalising cannabis is a slippery slope towards abolishing the DEA, which would be very detrimental… to the people working at the DEA that is.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Legalising cannabis is a slippery slope towards abolishing the DEA

        Like, I get the rest is a joke, obviously…

        But even outright legalizing cannabis federally wouldn’t mean the DEA ran out of work. It means they run out of easy work.

        There’s an opioid epidemic, fentanyl being put in everything, meth being made all over, cocaine and heroin being smuggled in…

        It’s just the people who do that stuff are actually dangerous and/or actually know what they’re doing.

        Like when you call the cops to report a robbery and they show up 3 days later to fill out a report for your insurance. They could try to solve the crime, but that’s difficult, so they don’t.

        The DEA has lots of important shit they could be doing, it’s just important shit is rarely easy.