• Ledivin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s great that they can pretend that’d be the case while standing literally no possible risk of being elected. It’s easy to stand by your morals when there is no risk at all of having to defend or enact them.

    • K1nsey6
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      56
      ·
      4 months ago

      I would rather vote for what I want in government and not get it than to vote against something and get it anyway. Democrats voted against Trump and his policies in 2020 and got someone keeping his worst policies, and now want someone even further to the right than Biden was.

      • otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        This is a completely infantile concept. You wanna throw a tantrum for something you want, regardless of how asinine or unlikely it is, and despite all facts pointing to its irrationality? smdh. 🖕🏽

        • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          47
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Look at their comment history. Joined almost exactly a year ago, had maybe 5-ish comments. Then a month ago, Harris replaces Biden giving Democrats a solid chance at the presidency, and suddenly they now have around 200 comments, every single one of them being in /c/politics and promoting Jill Stein and conflating Kamala Harris with Republicans (e.g. calling her voters “BlueMAGA”).

          I don’t care if it’s their intended goal or not; the actual effect of their rhetoric is “I want enough leftists to throw their vote away to a Russian plant so the US elects a fascist into office.”

        • K1nsey6
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          37
          ·
          4 months ago

          Voting for the same people and policies and expecting a different result is the infantile concept

          • bobburger@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            So voting for a random third party and changing absolutely nothing is an infantile concept?

          • dezmd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            That’s the exact argument against voting for Green party candidates.

            • K1nsey6
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              Just to be clear how has voting for the same people expecting different results changed literally anything? We are having the exact same conversations about wages, housing, employment, healthcare education, etc. that they were having during the civil rights movements, that they were having during the Great depression. If we’re continuing to have the exact same conversations, things are not getting any better