What made everybody move from a corporate social media platform to another corporate social media platform instead of the fediverse?

After all, the Fediverse and Activitypub is much more mature than Bluesky and the copycat AT protocol or Threads and … whatever they use.

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
    61·
    2 months ago

    because mastodon because dismissed twitter users concerns and thoughts the first exodus and bluesky implemented them in a way that’s closer to twitter.

      • bss03@infosec.pubEnglish
        3·
        2 months ago

        There have been some complaints about Mastodon for years; both specific (“quote tweets”) and vague (get rid of shitty, often bigoted replies for profiles with a lot of followers or with a marginalized identity).

        Mastodon largely hasn’t implemented them. Maybe Bluesky has. (I don’t have a BS account.)

    • CyclohexaneEnglish
      1·
      2 months ago

      The fediverse has many micro blogging implementations outside of mastodon if you don’t like their featureset (and they federate with each other, unlike bluesky). The only features I couldn’t find are those that contributed to making Twitter the dystopian toxic space that it is.

      • bss03@infosec.pubEnglish
        2·
        2 months ago

        Using another ActivityPub-based interface is a LOT to ask for many users. They want a simple to pronounce name, they can stick in their browser’s universal bar and be on a sign-up page in less than 3 clicks without making any more choices.

        😞

        • CyclohexaneEnglish
          3·
          2 months ago

          Well I am speaking about users who may be picky about mastodon’s features. If someone is picky, I don’t imagine they’d care much about just finding a platform with their preferred features, similar to how they didn’t like mastodon and found bluesky instead.