• arthur@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    There is, the “Marco Civil da Internet” states that a business that works in Brazil needs to respect Brazil’s law, and non compliance may trigger block in it’s service by ruling. The representation don’t need to be on the country, the problem with Twitter is that they closed its offices here trying to avoid compliance in the first place. Elon is trying to enforce his views over Brazil’s law. To force a crisis IMHO.

    • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Oh yeah, not the person you replied to directly, but it’s insanely obvious to me that this is YET ANOTHER PR stunt to make Elon look like he’s being targeted. ANY other international social media would have tried to resolve this quietly, the public probably wouldn’t even know.

    • arthur@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Based on some opinion articles, there’s something to add: Xitter is bleeding money, fast. Closing Brazil’s office may be just a business move to limit costs. Doing it this way may be a strategy to limit the damage of admitting that the business health is in bad shape. With the added benefits of attack Brazil’s institutions and causing chaos that could benefit the far-right here.

    • CALIGVLA@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Elon is trying to enforce his views over Brazil’s law. To force a crisis IMHO.

      He’s trying to see how far he can push his bullshit.

      There is, the “Marco Civil da Internet” states that a business that works in Brazil needs to respect Brazil’s law, and non compliance may trigger block in it’s service by ruling.

      That’s the thing though, to my knowledge Twitter didn’t break any laws, they ignored an order to take down accounts from their website. You could make the argument that in ignoring that order they were going against the law, but that’s about it. And honestly, that’s not the first time that has happened, this time they just decided to block Twitter because Musk was being a little shit about it, again maybe this will serve as a precedent in the future.

        • CALIGVLA@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sure, but there are those who say Moraes is overstepping with his demands. Quite frankly I don’t know what to say, all I know is that any loss for Musk is a win for me.

          🤷‍♂️

          • arthur@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Sure, but there are those who say Moraes is overstepping with his demands.

            This decision will go through collective decision on STF, soon will not be only Moraes decision.

            all I know is that any loss for Musk is a win for me.

            Totally agree on that.