• snooggums@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    85%+ of hydrogen production is currently from fossik fuels. While there is a forseeable future where solar and other green energy could be used, an immediate increase in hydrogen production would come 100% from fossil fuel producers.

    So yeah, it is currently oil company propaganda from trying to find alternate revenue streams.

    • Chefdano3@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Well in theory, it could come from nuclear. That’d be cleaner than fossil fuels.

        • Chefdano3@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Well the only reason to use it would be in electric trucks and busses. The main benefit of the hydrogen cell is being able to swap cells instead of waiting for a recharge, which is only needed for vehicles that need to keep a strict time schedule. The cells can be charged at truck stops and bus stations that can be fed by the power grid using nuclear energy, or by solar/wind if it’s a remote location, or a combination of the 3.

          Hydrogen cell is not a bad technology, just like all energy solutions (expect fossil fuels) they have their strengths, weaknesses and best use cases. There’s no reason why we couldn’t use each one where they’re the strongest. We don’t need to pick just one as an end all be all.