I asked and enough of you answered that allowing to federate with threads.net even for the lolz would be considered too risky for y’all.

So I’ve gone ahead and added threads.net to our blocklist.

    • Woodyboye
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lets try to not throw names around and keep civil please. Everyone is entitled to their own beliefs, even if we dont agree with them

      • Norgur@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, absolutely. So I am entitled to my belief that the commenter is a bootlicker. If you claim to be pro “we need to hear everyone out” (which I oppose strongly and deep inside you do, too), isn’t it hypocritical to claim authority over what is and isn’t allowed because “it’s not civil”?

    • very smart Idiot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bootlicker?

      My standpoint is that staying federated with meta shouldn’t be too much of a problem.

      Because if the content from there is not good enough to compete with privately hosted lemmy communities, then there is no readings defederate.