• Engywuck@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      51
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Everybody knows that Chrome, the only browser made by Google, has a built-in adblocker. /s

      Being called names just for stating the obvious. Typical lemmy.

      It’s not my fault if Mozilla won’t bother implementing a decent adblocker and have to rely on an external unpaid developer to keep FF afloat.

      • communism
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        3 months ago

        Firefox is a browser, not an adblocker. Why would they make their own adblocker when there are already independent adblockers that are very good? I would suggest Firefox just come pre-installed with uBlock Origin

        • Engywuck@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          31
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          “Firefox is a browser, not an ad measurement tool. What would they sneakily introduce an OPT-OUT ad efficacy measurement tool”?

          People would really do anything to justify Mozilla’s bullshit.

          • communism
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I don’t justify Mozilla’s bullshit, and I don’t use upstream Firefox for that reason (I use LibreWolf). Asking Mozilla to implement their own adblocker is asking them to reinvent the wheel. They should ship Firefox with uBlock Origin pre-installed like I said. Asking Mozilla to write their own adblocker which will likely be less effective than a third-party adblocker, is absolutely not the same thing as justifying them sneaking in opt-out PPA. How on earth do you even see those things as remotely comparable

            I’m saying that your suggestion is ridiculous, not that what Mozilla is currently doing is correct.

      • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        But see, you didn’t even read my comment. I made a joke that you were a Google employee and you reply:

        Being called names just for stating the obvious

        From the bottom of my little perogi heart I issue a deep sorry for hurting your feelings with that. From this moment forward I’ll do better!