• Linktank@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    il y a 3 mois

    Loving all the kickback for stating an empirically correct statement. This platform is wild.

    • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      il y a 3 mois

      I’m curious enough to continue the conversation, if only because talking about definitions is interesting. So I’m not being confrontational, I actually want to have a discussion.

      You say that all soaps are antibacterial because the result in the end is that no bacteria remains on the hands. I see what you’re saying there. But anti-bacterial soap kills the bacteria, including the remaining ones that couldn’t be removed.

      That’s like saying that removing a group of humans based on ethnicity from a region, without killing them, amounts to genocide. Would you say that’s genocide too?* (And I know the comparison is extreme.)

      *I think I read somewhere that forcibly removing people from a region amounts to genocide, though. But you know what I mean…