• Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    My point is that we don’t know. It doesn’t matter if something’s hard to imagine - we don’t even understand the bits of climate change that we’ve actively measured.

    It actually feels kind of conceited to me to think that we’re even capable of wiping out all life on the planet. Even if full on, worldwide nuclear war l with our entire arsenal broke out, I wouldn’t expect it.

    All we did was get the ball rolling. Our destructive capability at this point is moot compared to the natural forces we’ve unleashed.

    Saying life will persist is a point of faith or wishful thinking. It’s not a given. I wish it was. But of the two trillion or so galaxies in our observable universe, so far life has only ‘found a way’ on ONE rock that we’re aware of. Why would it seem conceited to express the possibility of failure for something with a success rate amounting to an anomalous blip in an otherwise 100% life-free void?

    Life is fragile as fuck. Even extremophiles are fragile as fuck when we’re talking about logarithmic temperature increases fueled by a literal star and a planet with an atmosphere acting as a giant magnifying glass.

    • mriormro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      By all accounts life on this planet isn’t special.

      It’ll be fine. We won’t.

      • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        This planet is the one and ONLY account of life. That makes it pretty special imo.

        And also makes it apparent how ridiculously the odds are stacked against life.

        • mriormro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          The scale of your perspective is of little importance.

          There exists objective, observable evidence of the fact that life has cycled continuously throughout the existence of this planet and there is none to suggest that this will change at any significant point in the future.

          • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            The ONLY data on the earth warming as quickly as it is, is the data we’re gathering right now as shatter record after record. We don’t know where these positive feedback loops end, or how any life will handle it.

            How life did during the ice age or dino-meteor etc doesn’t mean shit - we have zero examples to pull from that are comparable to what’s happening right now.

            • mriormro@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              My guy look up the great oxidation event. Life continued after the planet basically chemically burned away a vast majority of organic material.

              You somehow have the hubris to assume that life as we know it to exist is the only form of life that can exist.