I know the topic of whether adblock is piracy is debated, but I am guessing there are a lot of adblock users here and I was wondering if anyone has seen the youtube adblock warning message in the wild. I use ublock origin and still haven’t seen it once.

  • pazukaza
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Are you implying I’m far right? If so, you’re so wrong. I’m not far left either.

    They are literally giving them the content for free. FOR FREE!

    But no… “watching ads!?? For a 4K stream with machine learning generated captions for accessibility, multi-language subtitles, minimal buffer time and worldwide low latency? Are they INSANE! They are exploiting us! We are the victims of a corporation! Everything should be totally free and ad-free for us to enjoy anytime from our Iphones. Also, don’t forget to give me my paycheck in time because I’m also anti-work and it is abusive if I don’t get paid a fair wage for my effort, you cheap corporate pig”.

    • wanderingmagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, I’m just pointing out the community you’re talking about. This is a piracy community, on Lemmy. If you’re surprised that this specific community is hostile to your arguments, I’m not sure what you were expecting.

      Addressing the main point of your argument, the idea of the FOSS movement which many people in this community espouse is to have effectively a volunteer and donation-based society, just like Lemmy and the rest of the Fediverse. Peertube comes to mind as a specific example. For a significant portion of that population, communism and socialism are also not considered bad things. For others, the crux of their complaint is not against the monetization of content, but the degree to which said monetization interrupts their viewing experience - 30 second ads on a 10 second video, for instance, or multiple 10 second ads interspersed at 30 second intervals throughout a 2 minute video, with the lion’s share of the revenue going to YouTube and not directly to the creators - hence the creation of platforms such as removedute, Nebula and CuriosityStream.

      And what specifically is wrong with being paid a fair wage on time for work and effort matching the job description exactly?

      • pazukaza
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Then why aren’t they using these alternatives? Why does every company and place need to follow their ideals?

        • wanderingmagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          As the social media juggernauts, these companies are viewed as the embodiment of everything they see as wrong with a capitalist/corporatist society, and in their mind, by dismantling or fundamentally changing and challenging these juggernauts, they can inspire and bring about the change they want in society as a whole.

          • pazukaza
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            So they are against it by using it? What?

            I also think these corporations are evil, but complaining about everything they do just because it is an inconvenience for them? They should complain and act on the shit that matters.

            • wanderingmagus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Against it by “using” it in a manner which deprived the company of revenue - such as watching videos with an adblocker.

              This, in their mind, counts as “shit that matters”.