• Streamwave@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m glad about this. There’s clearly major issues with traffic in that area, but why on earth would the solution be to build a huge tunnel so close to one of our most ancient and iconic heritage sites? Think of all the archaeological relics this might have destroyed.

    Just build a new road further away from Stonehenge!

    • Zip2@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      I couldn’t agree more, the destruction of what might be there was my major concern. Digging a tunnel through a world heritage site should never have been approved in the first place, even if archaeologists excavated it all by hand.

      And I guess building a new road further away would eat into other national parks/landscapes. Not sure what the answer is here. Suck it up I guess.

      • Nighed@sffa.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        If they took it right through the hills and brought out out by Winterbourne Stoke then it would be much better I think?

        Most of the traffic is through traffic anyway. Bringing it up by Long Barrow Roundabout (it’s in the name!) was crazy.

    • mondoman712
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      New roads don’t reduce traffic, they create more. It’s called induced demand. We should be building viable alternatives to driving.