• souperk@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I get that switching to an EV is better than a fossil fueled powered car, but shouldn’t we be focusing more on public transportation, and generally not needing a car?

    • Beaver [she/her]@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I agree however it will take some time to shift from car infrastructure to multimodal design, as there is a balance that’s needs to be met for North America.

      Public transit, Active transport and 3-4 storey apartments should be prioritized over electric cars.

    • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yes, literally the ONLY solution that will impact climate change. But people prefer paying for indulgences so they can continue to sin.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        That’s literally not the ONLY solution that will impact climate change, because electric cars are already measurably reducing the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

        As for “indulgences” and “sin”: Yikes. Now is not the time for medieval thinking. In 2024, nobody is paying for indulgences. Because the people who buy EVs don’t think driving is a sin, and the people who think driving is a sin don’t buy EVs.

        • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Ah, I see you think we can buy our way out of the oncoming disaster. Good luck with that.

          FYI, I’m an EV driver, you don’t need to tell me anything about ev drivers.

          • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            No, I think we can mitigate the effects of climate change with effective regulation. And part of that includes replacing ICE vehicles with EVs.

            • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              BEVs do not reduce emissions enough. That is the point. Not even close to enough. And that’s putting aside all of the physical space requirements, lack of water absorbtion, pollution, and personal injury caused by vehicles.

              It’s not an overnight fix, but the fact remains that people have magical thinking and believe EVs are fixing or addressing climate change. They ARE NOT, they continue to exacerbated the issue. Being marginally better isn’t fixing or fighting anything, it just lets you feel better.

              • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Nothing, by itself, “reduces emissions enough”.

                Climate change is a multifactorial problem and it will require multipronged solutions. This includes transition to EVs, transition to solar/renewable electricity production, higher efficiency homes, higher efficiency industry/agriculture, and more.