• davelA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Not yet, anyway.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I can’t count how many times I’ve heard people say “another 2008 is coming” over the past 5 years, yet here we are without another 2008.

      In June, the percentage of subprime auto borrowers who were at least 60 days late on their bills in June was 5.62%, down just slightly from a record in February, according to Fitch Ratings.

      A Fed rate cut could provide some relief. Traders are anticipating the US central bank will begin lowering its benchmark rate in September, following data showing inflation cooling. That, in turn, could allow borrowers the chance to refinance or enter the market to buy something else.

      At a very fundamental level, this is nothing like 2008. What’s happening here is pretty much just an intended effect of the Fed raising interest rates, which has made car payments more expensive, so more people are unable to afford them.

      • geneva_convenience
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Because the housing crisis keeps getting worse.

        2008 was a correction which flopped unnecessary companies the economy was filled with.

        Printer goes brrr does not fix the economy. It only bloats it more with VC tech companies and housing speculants. Which is why the housing crisis keeps getting worse every year.

      • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Back before 2005 houses were like between 75k and 500k. After 2005 houses never went back to those prices. In a crash people don’t magically get to buy a bunch of houses. Instead, companies snap up anyone’s houses that seem to be below market. So the price stays and it’s unaffordable.

        • protist@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          I honestly don’t know if I understand how any of your points string together to make an argument. “Between 75K and 500K” is such a range as to be meaningless. Home prices vary with individual housing markets in addition to the national market. There hasn’t been a “crash” since 2008, and around that time, it was pretty universally a buyer’s market, and a ton of people bought homes for themselves. The affordability issue really didn’t become a thing until after COVID, and it’s already trending back down

          • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            My parents bought their house in 1998 for 75k in Sandy San Diego near downtown. I bought mine in 2005 for 500k near sandy San Diego. I then bought a second place for 475k up in Irvine. All were 3 bedrooms, two bathrooms. The first two houses were from the1920s. The last one made in the 80’s. I hope that makes it clear. I sold my California homes and moved to rainy Seattle and was lucky to find a house for 550k in 2019. I left the California market when the Seattle market started getting too crazy too. In just these 5 years the price of my old homes according to Zillow has gone past the 1 million mark. One is 1.2 million, the other is 1.1mil. imagine that! In 5 years there’s no fuckin way I could just rebuy my old houses. So for anyone out there trying to move, do what I did and save first, buy before selling, and calculate for the worse possible outcome. That will get you a realistic baseline… think of everyone involved as little fucking money sharks, the contractor 10k, the buying agent, 30k, the bank 30k, etc etc.

            If you sell, your run the real risk that your entry money goes stale and you’ll be unable to afford the house you used to live in.

            • protist@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Yes, houses cost way more in the most desirable metros in the entire country, that also aren’t building supply to meet demand. Your experience is not the same as the experience of the vast majority of the US. I guess overall I don’t understand your point though, or how it relates to this conversation.

      • davelA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        The Fed raising rates only affects recent car buyers, so it can’t account for a 23% surge. What the Fed raising rates does do—and is intended to do—is cause unemployment, which inevitably results in missed car payments, and even missed mortgage payments.

        • protist@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          so it can’t account for a 23% surge.

          Why not? I don’t see this logic

          The Fed raising interest rates affects lots of things directly, including the cost of home and auto loans, not just unemployment rates, which are indirectly affected

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Exactly. Auto loans are relatively short-term, and you’re probably more likely to default relatively early into the loan than later, esp. since you would no longer be upside-down later on.