American gen Z voters share how they feel about Kamala Harris’s presidential bid, why they like or dislike her as a candidate and whether they think she could beat Donald Trump, as the vice-president races towards winning the Democratic nomination for November’s election.

‘I think she’s just what we need’

“I think [Kamala Harris] is the only one that makes sense. She will get the votes Biden couldn’t. She could get the Black, Asian, Latino, women’s, LGBTQ+ and youth votes. She stands more for progress and equality than an old white dude and if she wins it will be historic. The Democrats need a bold move and I think she’s just what we need.

“I hope the Democrats realize what an opportunity this is for them.” Will, 22, construction worker from Portland, Oregon

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Vote for the administration AND JUDGES!

    we’ve had a front row seat to what happens when idiots don’t vote (for Hillary because butterymales or whatever) because they’re too focused on the personality of the candidate… Who picks the judges matters!

    • ceenote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      4 months ago

      Alito and Thomas have both signalled that they’ll retire if Trump wins. I find forcing them to either remain in a job they both clearly dislike or get replaced with a judge who’ll reverse the harm they’ve done to be pretty motivational.

          • jaemo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            As long as it’s at the end of a long, painful, emasculating blight that visibly withers them every day for all to see. They deserve to be turned into the ghouls they are on the inside, right in front of the public.

            Like morphing into Palpatine from shooting all that sith judicial ruling lightning.

    • Jo Miran
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      For sure. I throw judge selection under administration. The President doesn’t know any of these judges, they are presented to the President by the team the President put together.

      • slickgoat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        This is how it is done in Australia by our High Court. A judiciary panel shortlists the candidates and the Government usually takes the first on the list - conservative or liberal government, doesn’t matter. The selection isn’t politicised - the most qualified gets the job.

        Our high court has a reputation for annoying governments from either side.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 months ago

          I wish… Our system is the heritage foundation chooses whatever judges align with what they want to accomplish, spend 2 decades calling liberal appointed judges “activist judges that want to legislate from the bench” and then hand the Republican president a list of activist judges who will legislate from the bench because everything Republicans say their opposition does is projecting what they actually intend to do…

          I hate that it works… They do it first so when you push back on what they are doing it looks like the childish “no you!” argument so it immediately defuses any resistance…

    • leadore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yep. Trump pulled his judge picks right off the wish list of extremist judges the Heritage Foundation hand-picked for him. It’s sickening how many judges he got to appoint, on top of getting to choose 3! 😭 SCOTUS justices (one of the seats was stolen by McConnell).

      Of course one of those judges was Aileen Cannon who after delaying the classified docs case against him as long as possible, finally went ahead and tossed it out completely on the ridiculous grounds that there shouldn’t have been a special prosecutor for it.