It should be someone in their 40s for long term strategy.
But it’s gonna be Mark Kelly, who’s already 60.
We need to go back to the VP being “next generation”. We didn’t do it for Obama because they were afraid racist moderates needed Joe on board to vote for the Black guy.
But before that, the VP was the way to groom a future president.
It should be someone in their 40s for long term strategy.
But it’s gonna be Mark Kelly, who’s already 60.
We need to go back to the VP being “next generation”. We didn’t do it for Obama because they were afraid racist moderates needed Joe on board to vote for the Black guy.
But before that, the VP was the way to groom a future president.
Word choice could use some work.
Which part is the problem?