• rodneylives@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    To people saying don’t believe every image you see: given many US municipalities’ war against homeless people, signs like this are all too plausible. I’m surprised some city hasn’t done this already.

    To people saying, effectively, “gotcha har har”: stop posting plausible satirical signs without explanation, in other contexts we call that “lying.”

    • SeattleRain@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, any good art is provocative. It’s not so much that people are gullible enough to believe it. It’s that it’s so possible that you have to think about it in the first place.

    • Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I mean, the bench is painted. Paint isn’t usually known for being an electrical conductor. While conductive blends exist, I don’t think they’d be very viable nor cost effective for an outdoor application such as this. That’s just speculation though. There are also the safety and liability issues with something like this, for insurance if the electricity were turned on by accident during hours it should be safe.

      If a city government can pay $20k extra per unit to ensure it causes needless suffering to homeless ppl (and get away with it), I wouldn’t hold my breath on them not spending it. That said, we should probably reserve our ire for actual anti-homeless atrocities committed by PDs and city councils. Art projects making an apt social commentary are thought provoking but should be recognized as such.

      Of course, as you mentioned it’s entirely possible something like this exists already. I haven’t seen any proof of that, but in such a case it would probably be easier to just not paint the bench and leave it at that.

    • ohmyiv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      So you’re basically saying “I can’t be bothered to think or do anything beyond knee jerk reactions to images. I can’t even take a minute to check comments or other sources to see what this image is about. I’m going to blame everyone else but me for me believing this. In the future, instead of me taking a moment to quell my knee jerk reactions, the internet should spell things out for me.”

      Not to be a negative ninny, but I dont think that’s gonna work out. Instead, I recommend checking sources before having knee jerk reactions to things on the internet, especially images. It really makes life easier to navigate.