• Norgur@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    2 months ago

    Remember the outrage! A president who didn’t tell the truth about his sex life right away was unthinkable!

    • archonet@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      More than that, we tried to impeach him for it! Imagine that, our politicians being held accountable for their dishonesty.

      • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 months ago

        No, they tried to impeach him. They were just looking for any angle to do it with. They assigned an open ended special prosecution to find something, anything they could use and Clinton decided to perjure himself on it. It wasn’t noble

        • archonet@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Listen, I’m not saying Clinton wasn’t rad as a president – he was – but I’d also say him cheating on his wife wasn’t very “noble”, either. Nor was lying about it on TV to the entire country after getting caught.

          Yeah, I know, it’s Hillary, but still not a cool thing to do.

          • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            From that perspective i found it insane that she stayed with him and then tried to become president herself. Gal, you sucked it up to your cheating husband, because of your power greed. This is a red flag larger than at the Sowjet parades.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s pretty funny

      During the deposition, Clinton was asked “Have you ever had sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky, as that term is defined in Deposition Exhibit 1?” The judge ordered that Clinton be given an opportunity to review the agreed definition. Afterwards, based on the definition created by the Independent Counsel’s Office, Clinton answered, “I have never had sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky.” Clinton later said, “I thought the definition included any activity by [me], where [I] was the actor and came in contact with those parts of the bodies” which had been explicitly listed (and “with an intent to gratify or arouse the sexual desire of any person”). In other words, Clinton denied that he had ever contacted Lewinsky’s “genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks”, and effectively claimed that the agreed-upon definition of “sexual relations” included giving oral sex but excluded receiving oral sex

      • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is the most lawyer thing I’ve read. Hahaha. I totally forgot about that.

        Yes I abused my position of power to get head from a junior intern. But… the rules are the rules, what you gonna do?