• Etterra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s more likely a cost benefit analysis. Fighting the Unions is lawyer expensive and PR expensive. Gamers are noisy after all, when riled up. Microsoft is evil, but also like Trump, they understand optics.

      • Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Oh this could definitely be it, let the union exist, get the good press, and then fuck them hard in contract negotiations.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          I think it might be more subtle than that, unions exist so that when negotiations happen they can fuck back, but we know Microsoft can strategise longer term than that. They pioneered “embrace, extend, extinguish”. Embracing a union then trying to infiltrate and turn it into a corporatised union is another version of that exact same play.

    • kingthrillgore
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Companies can leverage CBAs to “fix” pay scales well below CPI or other metrics by forcing extensive negotiation as a way to sell down an agreement. Similarly, they can use agreements to create separate classes, for example: the SAG/AFTRA agreement for voice actors with all the Gen AI exemptions.