Optional@lemmy.world to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 4 months agoA TL;DR of the Goldman-Sachs AI Criticismlemmy.worldimagemessage-square107fedilinkarrow-up1664arrow-down118
arrow-up1646arrow-down1imageA TL;DR of the Goldman-Sachs AI Criticismlemmy.worldOptional@lemmy.world to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 4 months agomessage-square107fedilink
minus-squarefine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up5·4 months agoI think that’s the obvious implication of this question, but you’re missing the implied question arising from that answer: is this a problem we want to solve in this way ?
minus-squareexplodicle@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoYes? But it’s the same problem as all automation - the majority of the surplus goes to the business owner, not the workers. In a better society, we’d be saying “hooray, now I’ll have more free time!”
I think that’s the obvious implication of this question, but you’re missing the implied question arising from that answer: is this a problem we want to solve in this way ?
Obvi
Yes? But it’s the same problem as all automation - the majority of the surplus goes to the business owner, not the workers.
In a better society, we’d be saying “hooray, now I’ll have more free time!”