GoDaddy really lived up to its bad reputation and recently changed their API rules. The rules are simple: either you own 10 (or 50) domains, you pay $20/month, or you don’t get the API. I personally didn’t get any communication, and this broke my DDNS setup. I am clearly not the only one judging from what I found online. A company this big gating an API behind such a steep price… So I will repeat what many people said before me (being right): don’t. use. GoDaddy.

  • John Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is what NameCheap does too. It’s freaking stupid. Domain registrations should not be managed by corporations.

    • loudwhisper@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      4 months ago

      NameCheap

      WOW! I did not know that. I just checked and after a little search:

      We have certain requirements for activation to prevent system abuse. In order to have API enabled, your account should meet one of the following requirements:
      
      - have at least 20 domains under your account;
      - have at least $50 on your account balance;
      - have at least $50 spent within the last 2 years
      

      $50 in last 2 years is not much, but for those who renew for many years, it is still stupid.

      Ironically, Namecheap is what the people in https://github.com/navilg/godaddy-ddns/issues/32 migrated to!

      I really wish that domain registration was done in a different way, but even in current scenario, gutting features for such a basic service to extract a few bucks and risking losing customers…?

      • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        These are ancient holdovers. Nowadays DNS hosting with API is a dime a dozen. You may have to pay for it occasionally but it’s not going to be even close to $20/mo.

        • loudwhisper@infosec.pubOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 months ago

          $20/month for a service that anyway is low traffic (especially for hobbyists) is a completely insane price. Even more insane is that their cheapest subscription still doesn’t offer any API access. I agree anyway, but are these staying in business just because they have a consolidated market share? Do they have access to more TLDs? I don’t know, I am genuinely confused. I have absolutely no reason whatsoever to even think of using GoDaddy again.

          • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            I like the way Bunny.net does paid DNS, 20M monthly queries for $1 and $0.1/M after that. With an API included, ofc. Now that’s the kind of pricing I can get into as a self-hoster, not $20/mo.

            GoDaddy advertises a lot, basically. So whenever a person who’s never owned a domain before searches for “get a new domain” they’re gonna get GoDaddy, NameCheap and (ironically) Google Domains as the top results. That’s pretty much all there is to it.

            • loudwhisper@infosec.pubOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Yep, I like bunny in fact. It didn’t have all the features I needed back then, but it’s a very good product, I heard very good things.

              I also agree about the pricing. I ended up not using desec.io, but if I did, I would have probably set a 1-2 Euros recurring donation, as I feel that’s a totally acceptable price.

              As for why people use GoDaddy well… I feel personally attacked as that’s exactly how I ended up there, when I didn’t know better.

    • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m saying this for years, but a) it’s quite late (seems like a 1990s issue) and b) OpenNIC is a bit of a joke atm (but support it anyways)

      ICANN never should’ve been a creature of US-NTIA, but of the UN. The US has no right to decide for the digital world how everyone communiticates. No one really should (apart from about stuff like CSAM).

      • can@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I still think they are but maybe my needs are simple. It was definitely better when I switched over (from godaddy*) during one of the migrations.

        • foggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          They’ve been my go-to rec for like 6 years 😢

          Their support is top tier, which is important when it’s important. But this complicates things. I’ll have to take a close look at the competition these days.