IMO, The US has crumbling infrastructure, corrupt government, dangerous cities, and a lot of homelessness, among so many other problems. Hell, millions of people in the US don’t even have power right now.

What’s the difference?

  • Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Languages evolve over time, all dictionaries now have OPs use of the word as the first definition.

        • bstix@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          USA doesn’t fit any of those definitions anyway.

          I know what OP means, 3rd world is just not the right word.

          USA is a banana republic

          • Grimy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Oh 100%, I’m just saying his use of the word is in no way wrong like half the comments seem to imply. Everyone knew exactly what he meant and the definition is in most dictionaries.

            This seems to pop up everytime the word is used and it’s a major pet peeve of mine.

            My comment is only aimed at those that think third world only means the historical definition when that hasn’t been the case for at least two decades. The word third world is almost always used to mean developing country in day to day conversation.

    • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I guess I still go by the original definition. There are other words that offer more detail anyway - kakistocracy, gerontocracy, corporatocracy, kleptocracy, etc.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Developing countries would be the synonym for third world in the definition used by OP.

    • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I agree language is descriptive and not prescriptive, but it sounds like comparing two categories developing vs developed may be more apt and not three like an updated 3 world model would entail. Or maybe I just find it unsettling to call something a third without referencing a third of something.