• Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    The fuck metric are they using for the economy??? The billionaires wealth increase? The stock market? Because I can’t afford my rent or to feed my fucking family. Fuck off with your bullshit.

    I don’t blame Biden for it, I blame the orange man. But the economy isn’t an exclamation point that should be used for the average person. The economy fucking sucks. EVERYONE HAS JOBS!!! … Yeah… they have 3 of them… start looking at the purchasing power of that money, not just the dollar amount.

    • Lavitz@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      This! This! This!

      Anyone who can afford to invest seems to be doing fine and everyone else is screwed. Rent, bills and the cost of food are out of control.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        The weird part is people think the president caused any of that or has the ability to fix it.

          • Zak@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            He is a politician running for reelection in a tight race. He’s going to claim credit for anything good that happened during his term that voters might possibly believe.

            That’s not even meant as a criticism; it’s just how the game is played.

              • Zak@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Politicians claim all sorts of things that have, at best tenuous connections to reality.

                We shouldn’t accept the claim that Biden fixed the economy, nor Trump’s claim that Biden broke the economy, nor either of their claims that they’re going to fix it next term.

        • Lavitz@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          There’s this thing presidential candidates run called a campaign and in this campaign they lay out their economic policies.

          • Zak@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Presidential candidates certainly say things about the economic policies they’d like to see enacted, but most of the actual policy making is up to congress, and monetary policy is the domain of the Federal Reserve.

            Factors which no part of the US government has direct control over often have a bigger impact than those that it does, from plagues to wars on other continents to business conditions.

              • Zak@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I do. I also know that Trump nominated Chairman Powell to his first term, and Biden nominated him to his second. Seems they agree on something.

                That’s not even unusual; four out of the past five Fed chairs were nominated by at least two presidents from different parties.

                • Lavitz@lemmings.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  So we agree the president can make a significant change to the federal reserve which you said is involved in monetary policy. Which means…

    • EnderWiggin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Wages are up, and inflation is down. The economy isn’t roaring, but it’s a hell of a lot more stable than what Biden was handed in 2020. The examples you are offering, while certainly valid for the folks in your community, are anecdotal. The facts are in the data. This country is too big to determine its overall economic health with a localized eye check. Lots of folks are struggling. Lots of folks are also thriving.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    As always, “economy” in a headline can be replaced with “rich people’s yacht money.”

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    and the slowest annual gain in prices since March 2021.

    Its shit like this, dont tout this like a victory, i cant afford electricity right now

    • rayyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      The recession started to emerge in 2019. You don’t turn a large ship around on a dime. There are more jobs, wages are up and inflation is down. What do you expect?

    • Rookwood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      Biden has also had 0 impact on that. The Fed is managing that because Congress doesn’t do anything but pass legislation for lobbyists and the Fed is also driving up unemployment as a result.

      • blazera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        the president has the impact of the most powerful endorsement in the country. Technically, the president’s impact on legislation is just his ability to veto, but in practice both parties operate in tandem with the executive and legislative branches, the president is the figurehead of the party and the strategy has generally been to rally behind their campaign platform. With Biden we’ve had the inflation reduction act and the infrastructure bill. Obama famously drove the affordable care act, even though they personally didnt get to vote on it.

  • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    By ‘economy’ they always mean how well the rich are doing. WE are struggling, and the constant gaslighting that everything is ok tells us our cries for help are going unheard.

  • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    “Listen, dipshit. I don’t care if you can’t afford groceries, I don’t care if you our landlord priced you out of your own home, and I certainly don’t give a fuck you can’t find a new job that pays enough to live. The economy is doing great, all the graphs the capitalists chose says so. Your lived experience is a lie. Shut up, don’t ask questions, and vote for me.”

  • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    In the United States, the minimum wage is set by U.S. labor law and a range of state and local laws.[4] The first federal minimum wage was instituted in the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933, signed into law by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, but later found to be unconstitutional.[5] In 1938, the Fair Labor Standards Act established it at 25¢ an hour ($5.41 in 2023).[6] Its purchasing power peaked in 1968, at $1.60 ($14.00 in 2023)[6][7][8] In 2009, it was increased to $7.25 per hour, and has not been increased since.[9]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_wage_in_the_United_States

    if people are unable to afford things the economy is not good and neither Trump nor Biden in their four years did anything to help the citizens notably minimum wage

  • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Note the complete absence of any mention of housing prices in this article (and every other pro-Biden article about how great the economy is and why we should be grateful).

      • aodhsishaj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Drop in the bucket, the issue is with zoning and how banks are apportioning debt and packaging home loans.

        If we want home ownership to be available to the common person, and are unwilling to set a realistic national wage, we should just allow the Fed to issue home loans again and get rid of the middlemen all together.

        • MagicShel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Respectfully, two things:

          1. Biden has done something to reduce housing prices, which was my point. It’s a whole different argument to say he hasn’t done enough or has done the wrong things - fine, I was just saying it’s unfair to say he has done nothing to help.
          2. Zoning and loan structure isn’t nearly the problem that wealth inequality is. Tax the fuck out of the upper income brackets, and put it in the hands of consumers to spend and drive the economy and buy fucking houses.
          • aodhsishaj@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Hey, thanks for the respectful reply. I apologize for the delay in mine.

            I believe we’re saying pretty much the same thing. Banks being able to set rates based on debt and the nebulous policy of a credit score, feed into wealth inequality, especially as to how it relates to home ownership.

            Yes you are absolutely correct that the one main problem in the US today is wealth inequality. There is no arguing that. However, likely policy that has historical reference would be bringing back something akin to the Fannie Mae of the 1930’s but instead of paying the the Banks to service the loan, the Fed would take on the debt itself and would escrow the sale between the home owner and the home buyer.

            The reason I bring up the Great Depression is because as you’ve pointed out, the wealth inequality gap is growing, at a similar rate as to what led to the Great Depression. Unregulated securities are being traded by common folk and there’s a looming sea change as to what employment will look like.

            Unfortunately for us both, we live in interesting times.

          • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Have you heard of executive orders? Sure he can’t do it directly, but imposing a 100% tax on corporations/individuals buying more than a certain number of residential properties? A large tax on rental income from residential properties? Quit acting like he’s powerless.

            • Billiam@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              The President can’t impose taxes, bud. That’s Constitutionally delegated to Congress.

              Now, if you said “use the military to arrest any corporation that owns more than five residences” you would have a case.

  • shiroininja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t give a shit about the economy. I’ve been broke through boom and bust. I care about the safety, freedom, and happiness of those I love. The centrists of the democratic party like this bag o bones are doing nothing about that.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is bad messaging even though he probably has prevented some level of collapse. The trump tax cuts for the rich have lead to a lot of assets being hoovered up by all the surplus cash and the absolute ballooning of asset management companies. Until those things are fixed the economy will stay fucked

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Here’s the thing that kills me. This is what the presidency is kinda supposed to be like. He’s gotten a good amount of good (and bad) things done. We’ve gotten so used to lazy, ineffectual, malicious, and downright bad governance that a kind of normal presidency seems like “WOAH HOLY FUCK WOW” to some folks. Biden’s a solid statesman when it comes to the actual work of politics, but I wouldn’t say that he’s totally unique or a once-in-a-lifetime statesman. He’s not irreplaceable, we just haven’t been looking for someone to replace him because they did a good job hiding the fact that he needed replacing.

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’m so glad the “economy” is doing well so rich fucks are more richer and fuckier than before. Meanwhile everyone else is struggling. Hard. Such great. Many progressive.

      And how was this accomplished? Oh yea, by the Fed just printing trillions and trillions of dollars. How can the economy be bad when we’re making so much new money?