Beaver [she/her]@lemmy.ca to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agoThere’s only one relevant questionrobertreich.substack.comexternal-linkmessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up118arrow-down132cross-posted to: antitrumpalliance@lemmy.worlduspolitics@lemmy.worldpolitics@lemmy.world
arrow-up1-14arrow-down1external-linkThere’s only one relevant questionrobertreich.substack.comBeaver [she/her]@lemmy.ca to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square29fedilinkcross-posted to: antitrumpalliance@lemmy.worlduspolitics@lemmy.worldpolitics@lemmy.world
minus-squarehitmyspot@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoNo, abrasive is more accurate. You probably think its neutral, but it isn’t. That’s the point. Youre being critical of people explaining to you what you clearly don’t understand.
No, abrasive is more accurate. You probably think its neutral, but it isn’t. That’s the point. Youre being critical of people explaining to you what you clearly don’t understand.