filister@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agoUS Gaza aid pier to be permanently dismantled after operating for just 20 days – reports | The Guardianwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up1192arrow-down11 cross-posted to: palestinepalestine@lemmy.world
arrow-up1191arrow-down1external-linkUS Gaza aid pier to be permanently dismantled after operating for just 20 days – reports | The Guardianwww.theguardian.comfilister@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square35fedilink cross-posted to: palestinepalestine@lemmy.world
minus-squareroboto@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22arrow-down4·5 months agoTo rescue the 4 hostages in return for almost 300 dead Palestinians and magnitudes more of wounded people.
minus-squareEmmy@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down4·5 months agoThis right here is the correct answer.
minus-squarejet@hackertalks.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down3·edit-25 months agoI don’t think it’s credible to say that The pier was built for the Israeli rescue operations. In fact, without the pier they still would have executed the operation. Pier was convenient, but not necessary
minus-squareEmmy@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·5 months ago In fact, without the pier they still would have executed the operation. Pier was convenient, but not necessary There’s absolutely no way they’d have allowed it’s construction of it wasn’t necessary for them. We can tell because it’s already being dismantled
How so?
To rescue the 4 hostages in return for almost 300 dead Palestinians and magnitudes more of wounded people.
This right here is the correct answer.
I don’t think it’s credible to say that The pier was built for the Israeli rescue operations.
In fact, without the pier they still would have executed the operation. Pier was convenient, but not necessary
There’s absolutely no way they’d have allowed it’s construction of it wasn’t necessary for them. We can tell because it’s already being dismantled