• snooggums@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    Oh look, you edited your first post with a snide remark!

    What are you talking about? Please be specific. All I’m getting are vague “nuh-uh” answers. If you want to actually convince anyone that you have a point, you need to make it.

    The first charge (edit: it was the third charge, I do apologise for expecting anyone to read more than a few paragraphs),

    Then you offer an ‘apology’ for getting a detail wrong…

    I apologise for getting a minor detail wrong about the order of items in the list, I underestimated how critically important the order of items in that list was to you.

    I do not accept your apology.

    • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      My comment made some actual points, but you chose to be petty and make this comment instead of actually engaging with those points.

      Don’t worry, the apology was insincere as you guessed, because the mistake was in fact not a very important one. But your obstinate, petulant avoidance of the war crimes that I know you’ve now read about directly says everything anyone needs to know about where you stand on the issue.

      It’s quite clear that you don’t accept my apology, and that that was what you chose to focus on. This seems like a pretty clear admission that you have nothing of worth to say on the matter. Well, not anything so gracious as that, but you wouldn’t make a comment like this if you did have anything worthwhile to say, so I’ll take it.