• sunzu@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    You are making assumptions here, ie that they become that away after they got the money… This a basic logical fallacy

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Your entire thesis here rests on a logical fallacy… How else would you end it?

          • sunzu@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Clearly this topic upsets you, and I don’t wish to upset you.

            You are making shit up lol

            This not agree or disagree issue. You were passing a trust me bro as some sort of fact and got called on it. Just take the L with dignity, boomer

              • sunzu@kbin.run
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                You are assuming that people become corrupted after they obtain wealth instead

                When there is another example that is just as feasible, ie they obtained wealth because they are corrupt.

                There is really no way to know which one is true either. So passing one or the other as a maxim is disingenuous.

                While I do agree with final conclusion, the premise you lead with doesn’t hold to scrutiny.