• einlander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    142
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s all fun and games until Facebook starts adding features, then eventually starts defining what the fediverse should do to maintain federation with Facebook.

    • aeternum@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Embrance, Extend, Extinguish. Enshittification. Call it what you will, but i don’t think this will end well for us.

    • V699@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is my biggest fear. The hidden weakness of the fediverse is that the largest implementation gets to set the rules of federation

      • sab@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I disagree. Mastodon does not “set the rules” for federation of Kbin, Lemmy, Funkwhale, BookWyrm, Pixelfed, Peertube, or any other platform in the Fediverse. The platforms are interoperable when it makes sense, but they are designed to fill different needs and it makes no sense for them to follow some centralized “rules of federation”.

    • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Welcome to FOSS software. It’s constantly evolving and forking itself. If Facebook wanted to fork ActivityPub RIGHT NOW, they could.

      How would that impact your life at all? You could stay using lemmy and mastodon like you have been.