• GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m not arguing how we punish people I’m arguing why do we punish people What’s the point of putting a person in jail or prison for some length of time if, when the get out they are still saddled with their crime?

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      So I go back to my question…does a convicted child molester finish their jail sentence and the can go and work around children? Or do we also accept that maybe, even after the person has finished their sentence, that the “punishment” continues to protect society?

      If the latter, then the question becomes when this is appropriate, and not if it is ever appropriate.

      • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yes. Go back to my previous post I mention that in some cases maybe the punishment never ends due to the crime committed. But not all crimes deserve life long punishment. But I’m not arguing sentencing guidelines really, What I want to know is if someone is convicted of a felony, completes the punishment given to them, should they still be called a felon?

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          So the current position is that felony convictions stay on your record forever and individuals can decide whether or not to do business with these people.

          You’re saying that the current system is bad…but only for some crimes.

          I’m pointing out that your argument as to why is arbitrary… Just “what we decide” as a society, and the current decision is that felonies, no matter what, stick around.