• atomicorange@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yes. The supreme court just made it legal for the president to destroy the country by doing all that. Do you see the problem?

      • fiercekitten@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Justice Sotomayor wrote a dissent that basically says that anything can be an official act (with enough creativity i’m sure) and it’s not hyperbole.

      • ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        No one is going to believe your arguments over the dissenting judges.

        It is also very telling you’ve responded to no comments mentioning what the dissenting judges have said.

        • Akuden@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          The dissent is in bad faith and should be discarded. The president enjoys no authority to assassinate anyone and therefore enjoys no immunity for doing so. The dissent is not serious and should be treated as such.

          • Victoria Antoinette @lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            The president enjoys no authority to assassinate anyone

            obama thanks you for not remembering that time he assassinated a 16 year old american citizen.

          • ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            The dissent is in bad faith and should be discarded.

            Based upon what?

            The bar for internet rando invalidating legal expert is pretty high BTW.

            • Akuden@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Based on the incredible hyperbole written in the dissent. Legal expert turned partisan hack quite quickly when they start talking about assassinations.

              • blazera@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Are you still at this shit? Im still waiting on you to provide where in the ruling it specifically addresses not allowing assassinations like you claimed