• SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yep. Theres a bunch of new bros including a tiny armadillo and I love it so much. Also huge qol changes and items and moves and levels and gear and… It’s a lot.

      • fsxylo@sh.itjust.works
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I told myself I wasn’t going to play again until full release but man is this game going to be different by then.

        • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think it’s in a good enough place to play now, if you like. Most of the stuff they added is late game anyway, so it seems like the early game is mostly done aside from any additional polish they want to add.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Is it possible to do a no-pal run? Because nothing makes me want to play a Pokemon game like killing them all and catching nothing.

    • Zahille7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Theoretically, yes. But it’s way more time consuming to be worth it. You can watch a couple videos on YouTube with “No Pal Runs”

    • SurvivalMariner@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I tend to use less powerful bows or weaker pals to weaken, call back your pal when most work has been done and use better balls for stronger pals.

  • Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Anytime here know if it’s good on Steam Deck? The store page is ambiguous about it.

  • Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t understand this obsession with player numbers unless it is a full fledged MMO where player numbers matter to a degree and up to a certain point. But for games like this it doesn’t really matter.

    • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because it shows many people are playing it. That in itself may be of interest to people who are considering purchasing the game. Also it let’s the devs know there is a market potentially interested in DLC or sequels. If the news was that player counts dropped to a very small number, neither of those things are likely to happen

    • Crowfiend@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Even if it’s not an MMO, player count can be a very strong indicator of enjoyment/income at a given time. Even if it’s a single player game, player count can show how popular a game is on whole. If a 5yo game still has engagement numbers above newly released games, it’s strongly correlated with studio income/gamer trends.

      They can base future decisions on what they did correctly/incorrectly, and develop their next game/dlc/etc with those lessons learned.

      Release a game that has nobody playing after a month? Crapbasket. Release a game that has well into a million players despite the age? Fucking masterpiece.

    • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean, I started playing once I heard how popular it was.

      Pokémon with guns didn’t really interest me as a description but it turns out it’s fun when you try it.

      If so many people hadn’t been recommending it. I would’ve never known.

      At some point when something gets so popular, you try it just to see what you’re missing out on even if you don’t think it’s gonna be your cup of tea.

      And it’s really more like Pokémon mixed with ARK

      • Zahille7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s basically my experience with it too. Saw all the recommended videos on YouTube when it first released, I kept seeing tons of comments saying how fun it was. I finally decided to check it out after I watched Lets Game it Out play it, and yes it’s basically just cartoon Ark, but it works. It also actually works a bit better than Ark, so that’s also a plus.

    • alessandro@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Currently in the industry there are two ways to get the “big money” without resort on MTX and GaaS.

      1. “big day one selling carnival”. With few exception with titles such as Skyrim and GTAV (which have multiple “day one” or duble-dip), this is how the AAA industry makes the big money: the very first days is where the publisher try to recover+earn money as whole. Later copies sold are mostly for bundles or special offer.

      2. Early Access program. That’s where Palworld fall into. With few exceptions, this is the primary tool for indie developer that can’t invest money in marketing “big day one carnival”. It’s safer because route because they don’t to compete with the “day one carnival” from other AAA publisher. And can know straight away how much money they need to scale up (or down) their vision for the project (something WB couldn’t have when they went the suicide squad route)

      Basically, for Palworld have success (or not) alter how the product scale the game itself will be.

    • sunzu@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      It works like free marketing for a successful title

      As far as marketing… It is binign