• MajorHavoc@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yeah. I understand what they’re saying, but they’re wrong, based on past court cases.

    Defining “full equal service” in a way that carves out big portions (like knowing what the lyrics are) in ways that fully able bodied people take for granted - has gone badly for companies that let it go to court.

    • null@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      based on past court cases

      That you refuse to share with the class 🤔

      But they’re totally real. For real.

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Just because a building can afford a glass elevator so you can see the view doesn’t mean the building next door is denying full service to people who can see because they don’t have one.

      You’re a fucking moron and need to shut up, every point you’ve made is easily disproved, it’s like you’ve googled a term and read 2 lines and run with it.

      Think for more than 2 seconds with your lies and maybe you could see how each and everyone is just fucking removed as shit dude….

      Give your head a shake, you have zero knowledge on this subject.

      Provide sources, or fuck off.