• RBG@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    6 months ago

    Fully agree but I can tell you about point 1 that there enough gullible scientists in the world that see nothing wrong with the current system.

    They will gadly pick up free review when Nature comes knocking, since its “such an honour” for such a reputable paper.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Such a reputable paper that’s no doubt accepted dozens of ChatGPT papers by now. Wow, how prestigious!