• Eager Eagle@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    the initial location doesn’t need to be GPS, just a known anchor location. Which is trivial to implement in the case of trains, since stations don’t move that drastically.

    • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 days ago

      But wouldn’t you scramble the precision with that? Stations can be quite big and anchoring to the station location means you already start with an offset to your location.

      Depending on the accuracy over time, they could pinpoint a location while the user is sleeping and than use that as an anchor for the day.

      But everything about that is speculative; let’s see where this goes first.

      • Eager Eagle@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        you’re thinking anywhere on the platform, I’m suggesting a known place near a station by which the train passes and its location - at that moment - is known.

        All the system needs is a ground-truth location after a certain amount of time. GPS is just a cheap and convenient way to do it almost anywhere, but this location correction doesn’t need to be satellite-based at all.

        • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          Yeah maybe that could work. I definitely agree that there’s ways to get good anchor points. Maybe through cross-check with wireless networks even.