vegeta@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 5 months agoWitness tells House Ethics Committee that Matt Gaetz paid her for sex: Sourcesabcnews.go.comexternal-linkmessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1539arrow-down12
arrow-up1537arrow-down1external-linkWitness tells House Ethics Committee that Matt Gaetz paid her for sex: Sourcesabcnews.go.comvegeta@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-squareCharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down8·5 months agoI seem to recall that some papers took it upon themselves to publish names and pictures of “Johns” - I guess prostitution is legal for some, but not for others? Some Johns deserve to be named and shamed, but others, not so much?
minus-squareprettybunnys@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up27arrow-down1·5 months agoDoes the title not say his name and does the article not have his picture? What are you saying here? The “John” is Matt Gaetz. He paid for sex. He allegedly (and very likely did) groomed and raped minors. He is named.
minus-squareirreticent@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-25 months agoYou mean to say that child sex trafficking Matt Gaetz also pays for sex? I’m shocked! Edit: typo
I seem to recall that some papers took it upon themselves to publish names and pictures of “Johns” - I guess prostitution is legal for some, but not for others? Some Johns deserve to be named and shamed, but others, not so much?
Does the title not say his name and does the article not have his picture?
What are you saying here?
The “John” is Matt Gaetz. He paid for sex. He allegedly (and very likely did) groomed and raped minors. He is named.
You mean to say that child sex trafficking Matt Gaetz also pays for sex? I’m shocked!
Edit: typo