Maven, a new social network backed by OpenAI’s Sam Altman, found itself in a controversy today when it imported a huge amount of posts and profiles from the Fediverse, and then ran AI analysis to alter the content.

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s especially for these kinds of dumb cases where they simply copy content wholesale and boast about it. With more people licencing their contents as non commercial, the “hot water” these companies get in could not just be trivial but actually legal.

    Would be great if web and mobile clients supported signatures or a “licence” field from which signatures were generated. Even better would be if people smarter than me added a feature to poison AI training data. This could also be done by a signature or some other method.

    Anti Commercial-AI license

    • TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t know; AFAIK, Reddit successfully argued that they own Wallstreetbets’ trademarks in court. That might void all of these licenses depending on the ToS of the instance being used.