• A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    it never ceases to amaze me how capable conservatives are at recognizing how bad conservatism is, as long as you dont tell them its conservatism they are recognizing and criticizing.

    once you do, suddenly the brain shuts off and all that bad shit transmogrifies into sunshine and lollypops

    • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      6 months ago

      “Conservitism” to them is synonymous with capitalism first and foremost. In their dichotomy, everything that isn’t that is communism and therefore (since big communist regimes are fascist) fascist.

    • TheAuthor_13@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s almost as if he’s doing mental gymnastics to avoid coming to the obvious conclusion… who’d ever do that about their political beliefs?!

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I think the problem is “normal” right-wing politics and conservatism aren’t necessarily the same thing.

    The rational definition of conservatism is the maintaining of the status quo. No radical change. Don’t rock the boat.

    As a political philosophy, it’s boring. It’s safe. Just keep things the way they are.

    Fascism is a radical right ideology, demanding swift authoritarian change. Throw the immigrants in jail. Mass arrests of the opposition. Invade your neighbors.

    That’s not very “conservative.”

    My favorite politician was a conservative and he would not be recognized by a modern day Republican. Tom McCall, governor of Oregon from 1967 to 1974.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_McCall

    He put the “Conserve” in conservative. Preserving public ownership of Oregon beaches:

    https://www.opb.org/news/article/history-oregon-tom-mccall-public-beaches/

    Which also had the hilarious unintended consequence of putting the state highway division in charge of whale removal:

    https://youtu.be/V6CLumsir34

    Fed up with litter carpeting the state, McCall pushed for a bottle deposit to encourage cans and bottles be returned for recycling.

    https://www.oregonencyclopedia.org/articles/beverage_container_act_bottle_bill/

    “I want to make it very clear that there will be no quid pro quo in the form of relaxation of my commitment to put a price on the head of every beer can and pop bottle in the United States."

    He was the driving force in cleaning up the Willamette River, one of the major rivers running through the state:

    https://www.oregonhistoryproject.org/narratives/this-land-oregon/people-politics-and-environment-since-1945/pollution-in-paradise/

    But the #1 thing he is remembered for is his attempt at controlling growth:

    https://www.oregonencyclopedia.org/articles/mccall_thomas_l/

    “We want you to visit our State of Excitement often. Come again and again. But for heaven’s sake, don’t move here to live. Or if you do have to move in to live, don’t tell any of your neighbors where you are going.”

    All of this in service of preserving… conserving… the things that make our state great.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      When I was growing up, the difference between the American left and right was understood like this (at least by me):

      • Left: We’re all in this together, and we should work together to make sure everyone is okay
      • Right: Rugged individualism and healthy competition
      • And the push-pull between those two made for a good balance

      In my adult life, I am aware that that was never really true. The American Right has always wanted to restrict individual liberties, and implement a caste system, going all the way back to 1776.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      The rational definition of conservatism is the maintaining of the status quo. No radical change. Don’t rock the boat.

      As a political philosophy, it’s boring. It’s safe. Just keep things the way they are.

      If the way things are is cruel and unjust, then what is it to fight to maintain that state of things?

      Outside of a utopia, “keep things as they are” is unlikely to be the highest of moral grounds.

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Consider their law strategy: instead of targeting bad behavior, they target people they don’t like.

    He might not be able to understand a word being bad because of the actions ascribed to it. “So if Bernie did those things you’d call him a fascist?” “Uh yes, that’s not a gotcha.”

    He’s more likely to think something like “fascism isn’t actually a bad word because it just means conservatives and that’s my team”

  • HRDS_654@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 months ago

    I used to follow a subreddit called SelfAwareWolves that was dedicated to this. It was pretty amazing.

  • littletranspunk@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    Why can’t I find papers that don’t list the symptoms of my side being the bad guys so succinctly?

    -This guy

    • sparkle@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      Cymraeg
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      LOL’d at the edits of someone linking a neonazi and using that to say “Fascism is actually Marxism!”. It was technically in the right section I guess?