It is ironic how Pax Americana mainstream news condemn violence by “terrorists” with the claim that violence is never the solution, but then justify violence against every civilians in a region in the context of “anti-terrorism”. I read that the last Russian Czar had started the Russian civil war against the Communists from the indiscriminated killing of civilians who came to hear his reform. Is Pax Americana repeating the same evil act as the last Russian monarch? The Pax Americana’s policy of anti-terrorist terrorism against civilians could prove that the USA and Liberals do not care about massacre and it provide one more evidence to China’s claim that the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre was staged by NATO terrorists and not the people’s liberation army of Communist China. Another irony is that the Liberals claimed that they ended the cold war by convincing the Soviet dictator to “follow” the Liberal principle of mutual cooperation for mutual interest when the anti-terrorist terrorism proved that the Liberals had never practiced pacifism in reality.
Liberals are no different from fascists because more often than not they’re just fascists with masks.
Any liberal that condemns revolutionary violence on the grounds of pacifism and doesn’t condemn the violence that made that revolutionary violence necessary in the first place isn’t just a hypocrite but is actively insulting the intelligence of everyone around them.
The difference between conservatives and liberals is that the latter thinks you’re too stupid to notice they’re the same thing.
It is ironic how Pax Americana mainstream news condemn violence by “terrorists” with the claim that violence is never the solution, but then justify violence against every civilians in a region in the context of “anti-terrorism”. I read that the last Russian Czar had started the Russian civil war against the Communists from the indiscriminated killing of civilians who came to hear his reform. Is Pax Americana repeating the same evil act as the last Russian monarch? The Pax Americana’s policy of anti-terrorist terrorism against civilians could prove that the USA and Liberals do not care about massacre and it provide one more evidence to China’s claim that the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre was staged by NATO terrorists and not the people’s liberation army of Communist China. Another irony is that the Liberals claimed that they ended the cold war by convincing the Soviet dictator to “follow” the Liberal principle of mutual cooperation for mutual interest when the anti-terrorist terrorism proved that the Liberals had never practiced pacifism in reality.
Liberals are no different from fascists because more often than not they’re just fascists with masks.
Any liberal that condemns revolutionary violence on the grounds of pacifism and doesn’t condemn the violence that made that revolutionary violence necessary in the first place isn’t just a hypocrite but is actively insulting the intelligence of everyone around them.
The difference between conservatives and liberals is that the latter thinks you’re too stupid to notice they’re the same thing.